Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2003

« Robo-talk helps pocket translator | Main | Papa's got a brand new blog »

Monday, March 15, 2004

Comments

pete

It sure is time to sort out NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST!

The CORRUPTION is so rotten it can be smelt in Scotland Yard, Victoria Street!

The DECEIT is so strong it can be smelt at the offices of the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE!

The LIES are so abusive they can be detected at the offices of the HOUSING OMBUDSMAN!

Maladministration and mismanagement at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is getting from bad to worse!

The hurriedly set up website of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is being taken as a sick joke by the long suffering tenants of the Housing Association.

mark

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has
blanked you out
through LORD TOM SAWYER
He is rattled of his CORRUPTION
being found out!

SORRY MATE

mark

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


GERARD LEMOS - CHAIRMAN - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - HAS JUST BEEN OBLIGED TO 'FALL ON HIS SWORD' - JUST LIKE PETER REDMAN, THE EX CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF LORD TOM SAWYER, THE EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY AND EX CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

Errol

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – THE UNEXPURGATED AND UNAUTHORISED VERSION (1965-2005)

The senior members of the Labour Party want to remove this highly sensitive information from any independent site in the UK - yet this information is the truth that the most senior members of the Labour Party, including Tony Blair, Tom Sawyer, Clive Soley, Jonathan Powell, Charles Falconer (LC), Peter Goldsmith (AG), Ken Macdonald (DPP), Mike O'Brien (SG), Harriet Harman [all appear to have compromised British law on the altar of political expediency? - surely this cannot be true?] and their pals in the Labour Party do not want this sensitive information released before 4 May 2006 - the date of the all important local elections around the UK.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (IP) - CHAIRMAN – GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP - CHAIRMAN - GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LTD-DIREC'R-GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL PROPERTIES LTD - DIRECTOR - GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST SHOPS LTD–DIRECTOR-GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL CARE SERVICES LTD - DIRECTOR - GERARD LEMOS
LEMOS & CRANE LIMITED - DIRECTOR - GERARD LEMOS

+ BANKING CODE STANDARDS BOARD LIMITED–DIRECTOR-GERARD LEMOS
+ MORTGAGE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD LTD–DIRECTOR-GERARD LEMOS
+ A.K.C.T. LIMITED (KATHAK DANCE) - DIRECTOR - GERARD LEMOS


GERARD LEMOS (26/02/58) is a protégé of his mentor and friend, the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER (12/5/43) of Darlington, Durham. LAWRENCE SAWYER of CATFORD, south east London was appointed as:
Deputy General Secretary of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) that became UNISON (1981-94). LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER was appointed as GENERAL SECRETARY of the LABOUR PARTY (1994-98). He was and remains an influential member of the powerful NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) that controls the LABOUR PARTY (1981-94 and 1999-2001). He was appointed as CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY (1990-91).

Political spin-offs ensued:
Chairman REED HEALTH GROUP (2001-03),
Chairman of ROYAL MAIL PARTNERSHIP BOARD (2001),
Non Executive Director 'INVESTORS IN PEOPLE UK' (1998-).
A Labour peerage was arranged by the Prime Minister's office as a 'PEOPLE'S PEER'.
Then appointment as Chairman:
i) NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP,
ii) NOTTING HILL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LIMITED,
iii) NOTTING HILL PROPERTIES LTD,
iv) NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (IP),
v) NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST SHOPS LIMITED,
vi) NOTTING HILL CARE SERVICES LIMITED
together with other non registered entities (1998-2004) - as Chairman of NOTTING HOUSING TRUST, this was THE prime appointment in order to put in place the agreed proposed 'SECRET SCHEME'.

LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER was appointed to:
i) the Supervisory Board of THOMPSONS SOLICITORS (2001-)[useful to have a law firm 'on side', also useful for the law firm],
ii) Visiting Professor, CRANFIELD SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT (1999).
iii) LAWRENCE SAWYER was recently appointed by the PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE (10 DOWNING STREET, LONDON SW1A 1AA) as Chancellor of TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY.
LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER was a good friend of PETER REDMAN - the ex CHIEF EXECUTIVE of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and
CLIVE SOLEY (7/5/39), 24 BIRCH GROVE, EALING, LONDON the ex spokesman for the vitally important portfolio - the KEY portfolio to ensure votes - as LABOUR PARTY spokesman for HOUSING (1987-92),
i) Chairman of the PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (1997-2001) and
ii) member of the very powerful NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY (1998-2001).
He was responsible for the publication: REGULATING THE PRESS (2000) - his vision to regulate all the many press interests in the UK owned by Rupert MURDOCH [Sun, News of the World, Times, Sunday Times, Sky, BSB, Fox News, Twentieth Century Fox etc.] if the LABOUR PARTY were to win a third term. [Even with the BL ROVER collapse and the postal voting scam which would discredit a banana republic.]

[CLIVE SOLEY it was who wanted to shut up RUPERT MURDOCH - by denying RUPERT MURDOCH the ability to promote Freedom of Speech, through his discredited book 'Regulating the Press'.]

As a result of the extremely serious 'ALLEGED' FRAUD that surprisingly came to light within NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when very many valuable NOTTING HILL TRUST PROPERTIES were MISAPPROPRIATED by the management of the Trust, the CHIEF EXECUTIVE - PETER REDMAN was obliged to 'Fall on his Sword' with a substantial payment from LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER of CATFORD, south east London out of the funds of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST. Soon after, LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER - the Chairman hurriedly departed - to be replaced by his protégé and his very good friend, GERARD LEMOS.


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - CHAIRMAN - GERARD SAWYER - NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP - CHAIRMAN - GERARD LEMOS
'THE UNAUTHORISED BIOGRAPHY' [This is too politically sensitive to appear in the carefully sanitised UK media, such as the BBC which is headed by a good friend of the Prime Minister – Michael GRADE nee WINOGRADSKI.]

GERARD LEMOS (26/02/58) lives in the much sought after prestigious and highly desirable area of Highgate in north London. He lives close to the exclusive Pond Square with listed historic houses, close to a private gym in Swains Lane, behind the exclusive Highgate Society in Pond Square, not far from the exclusive Channing independent school, close to the Whittington Hospital but even closer to the Waterlow Park. Although on the same side of the road of his neat and very well kept house, bought in August 2002 with his partner PAUL CRANE for £750,000 through the Northern Rock Building Society of Gosforth, Newcastle and his house in Bisham Gardens [at number 7] is next to the tallest communications mast for north London which has substantial microwave dishes attached to it which the owners of the aerial are not likely to have informed him emit extremely high levels of electromagnetic radiation – does this not pose a high cancer risk for anyone living within a 500 metre radius of the high dosage radiation as emitted on a daily basis?


GERARD LEMOS was in 2004 appointed Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as the protégé of LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER who lives at 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, Lewisham in south east London (SE6 2NE) [contacts in high places can be and often are extremely useful] – he purchased his house in February 1997 through the Britannia Building Society of Cheadle Road, Leek in Staffordshire. LAWRENCE was the ex GENERAL SECRETARY of the LABOUR PARTY and senior member of the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) that controls the LABOUR PARTY and who had previously been GENERAL SECRETARY of UNISON – the very powerful union tasked with responsibility for 'controlling' employees of local government and central government. It was important for the prime minister to have such a person ‘on message’ without the possibility of union dispute.

Immediately before appointment to NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER was appointed to the House of Lords and with political support as LORD 'TOM' SAWYER he took control of the flagship Registered Housing Landlord (RSL) the flagship Housing Association – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - all part of the massive top-heavy and mismanaged NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. With substantial assets of over 3 Billion pounds [£3,000,000,000] the entity in its public communications pleads poverty and yet it is progressing rapidly in a major acquisition programme out of taxpayer funds, acquiring properties in key areas linked to specific political purposes. Over 18,000 properties translate as many times more votes as potential voters for election purposes - that is, after all, the BOTTOM LINE of the agreement between the political party in power and the major flagship Housing Association in the country. This agreement would be categorically denied by those underwriting it. The evidence, however, speaks volumes. The tenants provide the evidence.

It is good for TONY BLAIR as there is no accountability to government as the unlimited taxpayers money is paid through a non government department known as the Housing Corporation which hurriedly fled out of its base in Tottenham Court Road, central London to the provinces and the Registered Social Landords otherwise known as Housing Associations receive substantial amounts of unaccountable taxpayers money that is audited by the AUDIT COMMISSION - which is regulated by the Executive and is unaccountable to Parliament, whereas all taxpayers money should be regulated by the NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO) which is accountable to Parliament (not to the Executive). All taxpayers money should be accountable to Parliament.

Expecially when some £24 BIllion [£24,000,000,000] is being frittered away to Registered Social Landlords in this country. People do not need to have contributed one penny to the taxation system of this country - yet non indigenous people [no disrespect to them, but] they are provided with housing in excellent condition out of the budgets of Registered Social Landlords [no longer by local authorities to whom RSLs provide housing stock - the bigger the family the bigger the houses; more kids, very much more income support to breed many more babies] whereas the indigenous people who have invariably contributed to the taxation system are provided with damp properties with massive disrepair which are invariably a danger to health and often an environmental hazard.

It is simply a vote delivery system for Tony Blair - to be re-elected as LABOUR PARTY Prime Minister.

Deviously Clever.

The flagship Registered Social Landlord or flagship Housing Association is called NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

This appointment of LAWRENCE SAWYER [given a LABOUR PARTY peerage by his pal TONY BLAIR] was not co-incidental.
HOUSING MEANS VOTES.
SOCIAL HOUSING MEANS THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF VOTES FOR A PARTICULAR POLITICAL PARTY - THE LABOUR PARTY!

KNOWN AS GERRYMANDERING!

GOVERNMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TOGETHER WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CAN CONTROL EXACTLY WHERE PEOPLE LIVE IN ORDER TO ENSURE MAXIMUM VOTES IN MARGINAL AREAS

This policy of controlling key areas of constituencies is known as 'GERRYMANDERING' – the ability of moving core potential voters into marginal wards, marginal boroughs and marginal Parliamentary Constituencies - key electoral areas.

Enter GERARD ANTHONY LEMOS.

In May 1993, GERARD LEMOS flags up his CV with his highly privileged background with an expensive education recorded to the prestigious independent school of DULWICH COLLEGE in south London. This was followed by him undertaking a degree at York University. [A good solid university.]

His first appointment was as Director of LONDON INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF THEATRE LIMITED (THE) (1) Perhaps 'lacking in confidence'(?), he described himself by the rather grand name of ‘Management Consultant’. In April 2002 he was to leave the organization. His interests were of dance, the arts and the more gentle and delicate aspects of life.

In October 1997, he was appointed as a Director of HOMELESS INTERNATIONAL (2) resigning in October 2000. He described himself more realistically as a ‘Researcher’.

In 1999 GERARD was made a member of the BRITISH COUNCIL - a political appointment confirmed by the PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE as a 'prize' for political - in this case - LABOUR PARTY support. [Tom Sawyer to the rescue?]

The next major aspect featured on his CV is in October 1999 when he saw his appointment as a Director of THE BANKING CODE STANDARDS BOARD LIMITED (3). He described himself as a ‘Social Researcher’.

In 2000 GERARD was made a member of the AUDIT COMMISSION. This was a KEY appointment as the AUDIT COMMISSION controls the overseeing of the disbursement of public finances of all Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) of Housing Associations, such as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - the flagship Registered Social Landlord or flagship Housing Association.

In March 2000 GERARD LEMOS was appointed as Director of the SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS (4). He described himself as a person engaged in ‘Social Research’. In December 2001 he was to leave the organization.

In June 2000, GERARD was appointed as a Director of THE MORTGAGE CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD LIMITED (5) He described himself as a ‘Social Researcher’. In December 2001 he was to leave the organization.

In 2001 GERARD was appointed as a CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONER.

In December 2001 GERARD LEMOS was appointed as a Director of the CONTEMPORARY DANCE TRUST LIMITED (6). He described himself as a ‘Researcher’.

In March 2003 GERARD was appointed as a Director of LEMOS & CRANE LIMITED (7) which was set up as a vehicle to receive funds, as from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST in order for him to ‘research’ matters which were part of the ‘secret scheme’. Major government housing policy needed to be materialised – taking power from some - giving power to others – all part of government social control. Think of housing as the main engine for votes – policies that could be introduced that would do disservice to a banana republic. This was the major break that would transform his fortunes and catapult his trajectory onto another orbit.
Using the policies of Chairman Mao of COMMUNIST CHINA to his support. He studied how dictatorships worked. Non communication, non consultation, confrontation and promoting unaccountability. Hostile staff were promoted. Good staff were quickly dismissed. Kate Davies who does not answer letters from good tenants with legitimate complaints was quickly appointed as Chief Executive fronm Servite Houses. Tenants from her ex employer complain of the same tactics of hostility and yet she is paid astronomical sums of money for her inefficienct uncommunicative and confrontational behaviour to good tenants.
[Low level staff are often replaced by agencies, such as Adecco employment agency next to the Hammermith Public Library in Shepherds Bush Road.]

For the first time now Gerard LEMOS was to describe himself as a ‘Director’. It appears he gained his increasing confidence from a powerful source close to but not from himself. [Was it not TOM SAWYER?]]

Soon after in December 2003 GERARD LEMOS was appointed as a Director of the AKRAM KHAN DANCE COMPANY (8). He was to describe himself as a ‘Researcher’. This was, after all, his first love and his real self that gravitated to the nature of dance and art and matters delicate.

In 2003 GERARD was made DEPUTY CHAIRMAN of the BRITISH COUNCIL, known as being in the gift of the Prime Minister, invariably as a political favour.

It came to the attention of the AUDIT COMMISSION - the policing body responsible for overseeing irregularities of Registered Social Landlords – that a substantial amount of properties had been ‘ASSET STRIPPED’ from the portfolio of the housing stock of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST. As many of the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are vulnerable tenants, it makes it far easier to take advantage of many of them and to usurp and to blatantly misrepresent their housing and legal rights and with much at stake and much to potentially lose on the political front, if the scheme was to be discovered by the public – the management has to ensure that government policy is prioritised to ensure the same political party is re-elected.
PETER REDMAN as the CHIEF EXECUTIVE of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was expected to ‘FALL ON HIS SWORD’ and to take the blame for the loss of many highly desirable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties that are understood to have been misappropriated by management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST. [It was decided by the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) - whose head is the DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (DPP) - that there was ‘insufficient evidence’ to prosecute a criminal prosecution.]
[Ken MACDONALD QC is Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), decides whether criminal prosecutions are taken forward. Ken MACDONALD QC, the colleague and good friend of CHERIE BOOTH QC (LLB, LSE, London) of MATRIX CHAMBERS – wife of the Prime Minister, TONY BLAIR (BA Law, St John’s Oxford) who worked in the same MATRIX CHAMBERS. The specialization of Ken MACDONALD was Defence rather than Prosecution work.]

This was the reason why there was such a heated argument between PETER REDMAN with LORD TOM SAWYER. Why did PETER REDMAN have to accept SOLE responsibility for the ‘ALLEGED FRAUD’ with so many very valuable properties being plundered from the Trust and that was well known to be taking place at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?

Why take the blame - was this not a part of the AGREED culture?

This UNDERSTANDING was resolved whereby a substantial secret financial pay-off of over £100,000 was paid (on no account to ever be disclosed to the media or to the public) [in breach of TRUST LAW] to PETER REDMAN by LORD TOM SAWYER out of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST funds – all taxpayers money/money out of charity funds - that seems not to be subject to total transparency, absolute accountability or complete consultation. WHY? What of any property package?

It appears: Control the housing - control the vote – a well known political ploy.

If any political party wanted to address issues as serious as these - the law would be changed.

If any political party wanted to change the ethos and if the newspapers were not so entwined to the political party in power - there would be no need for any INDYMEDIA.

GERARD LEMOS had previously been relatively recently appointed as a COMMISSIONER of the AUDIT COMMISSION (in 2000-) [but the Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is regulated by the AUDIT COMMISSION, [the organ of the Executive not of Parliament and therefore UNACCOUNTABLE] this poses a very serious CONFLICT OF INTEREST thus compromising any proposed investigation by investigators of the AUDIT COMMISSION – this means that the AUDIT COMMISSION is now totally compromised and is NOT in a position and CANNOT currently investigate any alleged UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOUR or BREACH OF TRUST by the TRUST] [GERARD LEMOS had been appointed as a board member of the BRITISH COUNCIL (in 1999-)(Deputy Chairman in 2003-) and made a Civil Service Commissioner (in 2001-)] and he was to be put in place and appointed in substitution to LORD TOM SAWYER who was obliged to step down as Chairman of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and as Chairman of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP.

In September 2004 the life of GERARD LEMOS was totally transformed on his appointment by his mentor as a Director to NOTTING HILL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LTD. (9) He was to describe himself as a ‘Social Researcher’. He was also appointed as a Director to NOTTING HILL PROPERIES LTD. (10) on the same day, also describing himself as a ‘Social Researcher’. Yet to balance the hard nosed commercial organization of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP he was appointed as a Director of NOTTING HILL CARE SERVICES LIMITED (10).

The 'social' aspect of the Trust is equally hard nosed and on the evidence of its many complaining tenants, it seems to enjoy resorting to bullying tactics against its tenants. GERARD LEMOS described himself as a ‘Social Researcher’.

GERARD was also appointed as a Director of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST SHOPS LIMITED (11) describing himself as a ‘Social Researcher’.

In February 2005, GERARD LEMOS was appointed as a Director of A.K.C.T. LIMITED (13) No longer the ‘Researcher’, no longer the ‘Social Researcher’. GERARD LEMOS at last ‘came out of the closet’ as he was to describe himself as a fully fledged ‘COMPANY DIRECTOR’. [K. = KATHAK (Indian classical dance form)]


GERARD LEMOS knows much about the practices that are adopted as core policy by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST. Though many tenants have shown evidence that he will not respond to extremely serious, disturbing written complaints by tenants, he thereby ruthlessly abdicates any sense of legal, corporate, trust and personal responsibility.

The organization is truly out of control if a CHAIRMAN of a Trust acts as supporting unlawful behaviour.

In 1994 GERARD LEMOS wrote:
i) 'Interviewing Perpetrators of Racial Harassment'.
'Fair Recruitment and Selection' (1995),
ii) 'Safe as Houses: supporting people experiencing racial harassment' (1996) (written with support),
iii) 'The Communications We Have Lost and Can Regain' (1997),
iv) 'Urban Village, Global City: the regeneration of Colville' (1998) [impossible without the very close support of LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER and the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - as COLVILLE was a 'pet' project of LAWRENCE SAWYER a.k.a. TOM SAWYER of CATFORD, south east London],
v) 'A Future Foretold: new approaches to meeting the long-term needs of single homeless people' (1999)
vi) 'Racial Harassment: action on the ground' (2000)(with support),
vii) 'Dreams Deferred: the families and friends of homeless and vulnerable people' (2002).
The ‘evidence’ necessary to skew the vote?

The Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST through his senior management must ensure through his policies and the proposals of the previous Chairman and Chief Executive that some people have dreams bestowed – whilst for the sake of the proposed ‘vote delivery system’ others MUST receive nightmares a plenty? To any trust tenant that raises legitimate complaints to the management, repairs are intentionally not seen to or if they eventually are seen to, there is powerful evidence that there is a poorly delivered repair performance, this is often associated with a sudden misleading and deceitful materialisation of massive non existing ‘rent arrears’, there is a misrepresenting of ‘the facts’ of the housing situation of particular tenants, there is a common theme from complainants in placing ‘tenants from hell’ next to tenants that the management have decided ‘need to be evicted’ without going to court, as it is known by the management that the courts would not endorse a deceitful scheme of conduct against vulnerable tenants.

It is also known from many tenants that the management represent they have ‘offered’ some tenants flats when this is not the case. It seems to be a common tactic by the management that when the good tenants have lost faith in the management and have instructed them to correspond through third parties together with the sending of all correspondence through a means of proof – such as by recorded delivery – such understandings are not honoured by the management.

The management seems to give the false impression to many tenants that a flat has been offered – of which there is no proof – as the tenant has not even had the opportunity to agree a place or to view a place – and were the tenant who has ever complained legitimately, it tends to follow like clockwork that such a person would be offered a shameful slum not in the area of their choice and this seems to be followed with increasing regularity that soon after moving in, if the tenant accepts, a ‘tenant from hell’ tends to be placed next door so that the tenant can be stigmatised as ‘anti-social’. [Several tenants have stated that ASBOs can be a very ‘useful device’ if an unprincipled landlord lacking in moral principles is prepared to act in an immoral way by ‘providing’ the evidence against tenants that previously lodged legitimate complaints.]

The nature of the complaints of many tenants against the management of the Trust is shameful.

There is unanimity amongst most of the tenants that the management have just gone too far. Too many lies, too much deception, too much illegality.

The office of GERARD LEMOS is located in a shady looking entrance up the top of stairs above a chemists shop at 64 Highgate High Street, London N6 5HX
Tel: 020-8348-8263
It appears as if the office disguises far more than it reveals. Not unlike the unaccountable and bullying behaviour of the management of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP?

The office of his partner, PAUL CRANE and himself as LEMOS & CRANE LIMITED is very close to his luxurious and very tastefully appointed exclusive home which is conveniently very close to Pond Square, not so far from the Highgate and Archway underground station on the northern line in N6. It is the shiniest house in the ‘Gardens’. The number seven is the number of understanding – it is the number of GERARD and PAUL’s house. Although GERARD is a man that appears, from the way he executes his policy throughout the Trust, not to exhibit any sense of fairness or understanding. Otherwise, why would bullying and hostility, hate and discrimination against tenants be so rife by means of the implementation of policy throughout the organization?

Too many tenants of the Trust testify of that fact, so that it is not possible to dismiss such a large body of evidence. The senior management of the Trust have been found not to be of a standard that most people would expect should be necessary to uphold the onerous responsibilities they hold down. Too many tenants say that the senior management must go and go now.

Many tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that become aware of the 'secret scheme' of acquiring votes for housing will find it deeply offensive of the perception that differs from the reality whereby those in the know write about a 'terrible situation' which has been consciously and purposely put in place by powerful politicians who must faithfully represent those applicants that it has been agreed must - for political purposes - be given priority, whereas other tenants - it has been agreed - are not to be supported.

It has been noted that the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST enjoy lavishly appointed and highly desirable prestigious housing in the most desirable areas of London.

It has been noted that senior politicians in the key area of Hammersmith & Fulham enjoy prestige properties. It has been observed that key 'representatives' of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST seem also to enjoy well appointed properties provided by the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

The Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM is a 'MUST WIN' high priority Borough that needs to be targeted to win by the LABOUR PARTY.


The ‘secret scheme’ of ensuring the right votes for housing mentioned above was to be carried out, in practice leaving many tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP not understanding why they as tenants would be discriminated against, as some prospective tenants would receive utmost priority whereas other tenants would be ‘consigned to the dustbin’ in the allocation stakes.

Some of the management staff seeming to delight in applying hostility and cowardly tactics in ABUSE OF TRUST by a greedy self-interested and self-serving landlord against too many of its vulnerable tenants.

The situation at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is now spiralling from bad to far worse and appears to be going out of control.

RECOMMENDATION BY MANY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TENANTS:

The whole structure of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST needs to be ‘defanged’ by its negative, hostile, aggressive and anti-social senior management that seem to revel in the confrontational policies against its tenants.

It seems to delight in misrepresenting and deceiving its tenants and 'targeting' many of them for hostile treatment. Documentary evidence of far too many tenants bear witness to this applied housing practice.

Its hostile policy against its own tenants appears to be strongly supported by the Chairman – GERARD LEMOS and Chief Executive – KATE DAVIES who do not respond to urgent and serious complaints. Demonstrating a total abdication of trust and corporate legal responsibility.
Why? Think along the lines of blatant political purposes.


Unless and until specific senior staff of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are removed, the tenants of the TRUST and of the GROUP will continue not to place their faith or trust in the management.

The recent moves by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, after numerous complaints from too many tenants, the Trust management have tried to misrepresent that there is an effective complaints procedure and have quickly unveiled a hurriedly set up website. Yet this COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE by the Trust has been and is being taken as a sad but unfortunate 'joke' by tenants, as any tenants complaints that are now being invited to lodge any complaints on the computer recording system device is taken by tenants as neither serious nor worthy of serious response.

Indeed, many tenants have indicated that they are either fearful or apprehensive to complain. Particularly as this BLATANT and CALLOUS ABUSE of TRUST by the management or by their agents continues as blatantly as it could ever be.

Nothing short of MAJOR STRUCTURAL change to NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP will satisfy TRUST tenants.

Many tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are NOT prepared to reveal their names in this atmosphere of hostility and recrimination perpetrated from the senior management and relentlessly carried out by management of the Trust or its agents against Trust tenants.

It is understood that 10 DOWNING STREET and the executive of the LABOUR PARTY is only too aware that a wholesale discrimination of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants exists at institutional level.

Some tenants have argued that there is no longer a need for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to exist as an organization, as a business and as a charity for it has based its 'success' on the basis of peoples suffering and the management has tried very hard to disguise the blatant tactics for the most recent of its 40 years (1965- 2005) that has now come to a head.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST senior management has continued to pursue a course of conduct towards its vulnerable tenants for which it was originally established in order to end such abuse. The reasons for its incorporation were noble.

The incorporators were good people. It was set up by a very concerned priest, Reverend Bruce Kenrick. Winnifred Atwell was so determined to do something positive that she immediately provided funding.

Yet now the entity has a misplaced aura of respectability with the invitation of the Duchess of Gloucester to act as the royal patron - by a political party that, in reality, detests such a connection.

It has been argued by the senior management that they listen to the concerns of the many tenants - this is certainly not the reality. If it was, why would so very many of the tenants have been complaining of a negativity by staff, a lack of courtesy by staff, no repairs or poor quality repairs, no response to urgent calls for assistance, harassment by management or by their agents and anti-social tactics that were both unlawful and unacceptable to any tenant in a tenant-landlord relationship, not forgetting the placing of tenants falsely in rent arrears and the moving of anti-social tenants next to tenants that present written legitimate complaints in documentary form to the management.

The reality is that this whole edifice of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST serves a blatantly political purpose in order to return a LABOUR GOVERNMENT. [This is clearly unlawful.]

END THIS CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CHARITY THAT PAYS NO TAX AND PLEADS POVERY WANTING VOLUNTEERS TO WORK IN THE 21 CHARITY SHOPS IN CENTRAL LONDON YET WITH RESERVES OF HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF POUNDS AND THE COMMERCIAL ENTITY THAT PAYS TAX BUT CAN SWOP ITS PROPERTIES INTO THE CHARITABLE ENTITY TO AVOID TAX.
IT MAKES SURE THAT ALL ITS TENANTS IN ITS PROPERTIES ARE IN A POSITION OF WEAKNESS PAYING MAXIMUM RENT OFTEN FROM THE LOCAL AUTHORITY - SO THERE IS AN EXTREMELY COSY RELATIONSHIP.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can be summed up simply as an unrepresentative entity based on social (Peter) RACHMAN(ISM) at work, promoted loudly by politicians of a political party that sees a way of returning to office - no matter the casualties, no matter the abuses, no matter the illegalities – all for the sure fire way to power.


HOUSING MEANS VOTES – CONTROL OF VOTES - TO WIN AN ELECTION - PROVIDE HOUSING TO ‘THE RIGHT’ VOTERS - LET NO PERSON SAY OTHERWISE!

THE EVIDENCE FOR THE REASONING IS SUPPORTED IN THE BOOKS RESEARCHED BY GERARD LEMOS AND WITH SUPPORT FROM LAWRENCE SAWYER HIS CLOSEST MENTOR - THAT IDENTIFY THE ESSENCE OF THE ‘SECRET SCHEME’ STRATEGY NOW BEING RUTHLESSLY IMPLEMENTED IN THE UK AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF THE HARD WORKING BRITISH TAXPAYERS BY THE POLITICAL PARTY IN POWER.


WHO CONTROLS THE HOUSING? – THE RIGHT PEOPLE GET APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN AND RECEIVE: TITLES, HONOURS, APPOINTMENTS AND ADVANTAGE AND OF COURSE HOUSING IS NOT A PROBLEM!

EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO BUY THEIR OWN HOUSE - THAT IS THE WAY FORWARD - THAT WAS THE WAY FORWARD WITH COUNCIL HOUSING AND THAT WILL BE THE WAY FORWARD WITH PROPERTIES HELD WITHIN THE HOUSING STOCK OF REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS, KNOWN AS HOSING ASSOCIATIONS. THAT IS CERTAINLY THE POLICY OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

WHY IS 26% OF ALL TAXPAYERS INCOME TO NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PAID EXCLUSIVELY ON FAT CAT MANAGEMENT ON ASTRONOMICAL SALARIES THAT ENJOY CONFRONTING GOOD TENANTS - THIS IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE HOUSING POLICY IN 2006.

IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE IN GEORGE WALKER BUSH's UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - LAND OF THE FREE

EQUALLY, SUCH UNLAWFUL TACTICS SHOULD NOT BE ACCEPTABLE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

WE WILL FIGHT TO GET OUR POINT ACROSS IN THE MEDIA

WE WILL FIGHT FOR THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

THE UK HAS BECOME AN ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP UNDER THE LABBOUR PARTY - HAS IT NOT NOW BEEN EMASCULATED WITH SLEAZE AND TOTAL CORRUPTION?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NEEDS TO BE SORTED OUT NOW ! ! !


LOCAL ELECTIONS ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006


DO NOT VOTE COMMUNIST LABOUR PARTY


VOTE FOR FREEDOM


VOTE FOR DEMOCRACY

VOTE FOR AN END OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

VOTE FOR AN END OF THE CONFRONTATION AND HOSTILITY OF TENANTS BY TRUSTEES OF THE CHARITABLE TRUST

TRUSTEES HAVE A LEGAL DUTY TO ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE TENANTS WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES OF THE CHARITABLE TRUST!


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRU

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

JUST A FEW FAILINGS OF THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD IN THE UK -

FUNDED BY UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS FUNDING WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY BY THE PARLIAMENTARY NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO).


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHARITY (21 CHARITY SHOPS) & COMMERCIAL ENTITY

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ACCESS TO UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS GOV'T INCOME

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PROVIDER OF HOMES TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
18,000+ PROPERTIES

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
£4,000,000,000+ POUNDS OF PROPERTY ASSETS

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED LANDLORD IN THE UK

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHAIRMAN - SENIOR LABOUR PARTY MEMBER

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHIEF EXECUTIVE - LABOUR PARTY MEMBER

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANY TENANTS COMPLAIN OF ABUSE BY LANDLORDS

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT NO RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT LETTERS

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT ARE CONFRONTATIONAL

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT DO NOT CONSULT

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON COMMUNICATION BY MANAGEMENT TO TENANTS

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
SHAREHOLDERS ARE NOMINATED BY CHAIRMAN

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON INDEPENDENT AUDITING OF THE ACOUNTS

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WHOLE LABOUR SECRET PROJECT (HOUSES FOR VOTES FOR NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS) NEEDS TO BE DISMANTLED

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PRACTICE NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ORGAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE PROVIDED WITH EXCELLENT ACCOMODATION

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE GIVEN DAMP SLUMS IN DISREPAIR

IS THIS RIGHT?

IS THIS FAIR?

IS THIS REASONABLE?

john

CORPORATE INTELLIGENCE asserts:
[INLAND REVENUE REF: XN13652]

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.

If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]

It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.

ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.


BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]

2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]

3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.

4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.

5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,

ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,

iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!

The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.

How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?

The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]

All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.

As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]

Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?

Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?

It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.

As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.

The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.

What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?

The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?

They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.

Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!

The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]

If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?

As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.

Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?

Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!

ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?

This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!

In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!

KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.

With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]

If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.

[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.

Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?

So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?


TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?

Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?

JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]

WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?

To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.

The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.

SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!

A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.

LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL

This was no mistake.

This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!

The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.

Is this WISE?

We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!

BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!

So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.

The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.

Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).

The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.

The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?

In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.

Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?

‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]

Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.

The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.

Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?

Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?

‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?

Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]

So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.

Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?

Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!

This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!

This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!

This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!

Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?

We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.

We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!

Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.

Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.

[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]

Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).

But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?

Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?

Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?

What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?

The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?

Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?

Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.

The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?

Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?

Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.

All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:

FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?

Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?

This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.

No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.

Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.

This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.

The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!

Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!

It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?

Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?

Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?

Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.

Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.

Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?

On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.

Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?

Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.

We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.

We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.

We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!

We want the door OPEN!

We want complete CONSULTATION.

Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!

WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!

As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.

The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!

Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]

Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.

Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.


Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.

Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.

Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!

‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!

BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants or ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.

DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ at your PERIL.

Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.

Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ SUPPORTS VULNERABLE tenants.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.


IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!

FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???

If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…

‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.

‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...

delroy

dem Notting Hill and dem kate davies we cut off her puss when we get her. She wish she no cut dem brothers up she be screaming we cut dem tits off with dem cleaver the boys wil ride her skew like dey do dem tenants She be finish.

delroy

dem Notting Hill and dem kate davies we cut off her puss when we get her. She wish she no cut dem brothers up she be screaming we cut dem tits off with dem cleaver the boys wil ride her skew like dey do dem tenants She be finish.

john smith

B.LIAR IS FINISHED...

R.I.P.

Abdul Khan

If we get hold of that Clive Soley who ordered all New Labour MPs to vote for the war in Iraq, the one who lives at 24 Birch Grove, Ealing Common, London W3, we use the electric drill he use against our brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

lindsay

The Terrible Twins of the Labour Party, the Left wing loony Labour Lords Sawyer of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford and Soley of 24 Birch Grove, Ealing Common, London W3 go hand in hand into oblivion whilst besieged Blair in the Blair Bunker acts as the spoiler to terminate the term of the totally discredited Labour Party.

Sawyer and Soley encouraged the crazies, the Islamic preachers of hate, Sawyer and Soley gave them grants for cars, businesses and homes, whilst the crooked twins ensured they blagged the citizens of Britain - their own.

It would be laughable were it not so true.


So why did Soley demand all Labour MPs vote for the war in Iraq against all Muslims?
The alternative was to sack the Labour MPs.


Why were the terrible twins, the Labour Lords Sawyer and Soley such traitors to so many people, including all the voters of Britain?


Was it corruption?


Was it promises of money as the Judas of the Labour Party?


Or was it the promise to be a Labour Lord appointed by the discredited Labour Leader Tony Blair?

avakian

KATE DAVIES (29/3/56) of Flat 2, Corner Lodge, 107 Sussex Gardens, Radnor Place, London W2 2RU

Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair, British prime minister's chief of staff lives next door to NHHT at 27 Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith, London W6 OJL. NHHT is indirectly controlled by Tony Blair.

NHHT has just set up NOTTING HILL MARKET RENT LIMITED (9/2/2007) from 1,000 to 20,000,000 shares - just like that.

NHHT has access to unaccountable taxpayers money - it is known as the LABOUR PARTY piggy bank for rainy days and not so rainy days...

John Smith

Loony Labour Lord Tom Sawyer (12/5/43)of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, SE6 2NE (the one not to be trusted) put Kate Davies (29/3/56) of Flat 2, Corner Lodge, Radnor Place, 107 Sussex Gardens, Paddington, City of Westminster, London W2 2RU in place in order to 'socially engineer' the secure/assured tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust.

Target Jews.
Target Gays.
Target Caucasians...

Target ALL of those in the inverted Adolf Eichmann 'Social Engineering' Plan ['the good seeds' Gerard Lemos (26/2/58) of 7 Bisham Gardens, Highgate, London N6 6DJ 'has sown'...]

WITH POLICIES AS THESE - LABOUR WILL BE KICKED OUT

BUT THE IGNORANT IDIOTS OF LABOUR ARE FAR TOO STUPID TO CONSULT THE GOOD TENANTS - SO LABOUR ARE FINISHED...


THE IGNORANT COWARD BULLIES OF NEW LABOUR - EVIL BITCHES OF NEW LABOUR! THAT TARGET THE MOST VULNERABLE TENANTS - HOW EVIL IS THAT?

ONLY ADOLF HITLER EVER OUTDID LABOUR PARTY EVIL...


3 MAY 2007

3 MAY 2007 - ELECTIONS [Scotland, Wales, England]

3 MAY 2007

sdb

BOMBER B.LIAR of [St John's College, Oxford] Connaught Square [near St John's Church] off Edgware Road by Marble Arch, London W2 is finished!


The BLAIR Elective Dictatorship that controls and controlled Labour Lord Sawyer, Labour Lord Soley and Ms Kate Davies/Johnson (29/3/56) of Flat 2, Corner Lodge, 107 Sussex Gardens, Radnor Place, Paddington, City of Westminster, Lndon W2 2RU {the lacklustre and poorly qualified Special Adviser of the discredited Labour Party - with only qualifications in simple sociology - but blonde and with blue eyes - reportedly with vanity and arrogance a plenty - just like the NAZI Party (Labour Party) like!} who is promoting the 'Social Engineering' scam of the NHHT housing stock through the targeting and placing of NHHT tenants in the 'right locations' and who was made Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust on the nepotism/patronage of Labour Lord Tom Sawyer of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, London SE6 2NE - the man who betrayed all those members of UNISON (NUPE) Union and all those members who deserted the Labour Party who discovered the truth - all been conned?

Now the charity is being corrupted through the KATE DAVIES commercialisation of Trust property through the one thousand pounds (£1,000) to twenty million (£20,000,000) securitisation of the Notting Hill Market Rent Limited (9/2/2007) which is UNLAWFUL in that it constitutes a breach of contract and a breach of duty together with a breach of the covenant as between the Trustee directors and the Beneficiary secured/assured tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust?

No Consultation

No Accountability

No Transparency

Breach of Trust

Breach of Contract

Not Lawful

NHHT is out of control

That is why the Labour Party is in Meltdown!!!


3 MAY 2007 - ELECTIONS [Scotland, Wales, England]

3 MAY 2007 - Total ROUT for the LABOUR PARTY!

Soon after 3 MAY 2007 - BOMBER BLAIR will go!


LETHAL LEGACY - 10 YEARS of BOMBER BLAIR BOMBS!


BLAIR - THE EVIL DICTATOR

Notice that Ms Davies is supported by the evil MI6 spyman Jonathan Buchanan who lied with John Scarlett to concoct a 'reason' to kill some one million good Iraqi people. Many who fled to Britain - their assets confiscated - their children killed - targeted with Radioactivity for future life through Depleted Uranium so that carcinogenic cancers will continue in their genetic blood lines.

The result of the deliberate actions of Jonathan Buchanan, John Scarlett, Jonathan Powell, Labour Lord Sawyer, Labour Lord Soley, Ms Kate Davies.

What if her children were tortured one by one -what might she say - nothing?

mohammed

LABOUR PARTY IT IS FINISHED!!!


Thees site is censored by members of LABOUR PARTY...

All comments on thees site carefully censored...

 martin

Is it true that all 761+ complainants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are targeted as 'enemy' - demonised, isolated and discredited.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is it not the biggest secret housing scam in the UK today?

Dissertation

Great to tell about the quote of the Woody Allen,who s an American screenwriter, director, actor, comedian, jazz musician, author, and playwright,and also run the gamut from dramas to screwball sex comedies, have made him a notable American director,this is good to see the details,superb to share,great to tell.

Dissertation Writing Help

This is a good thing that you are trying to write something that people wants,so this is the thing which is required in blogging,to serve the people and gives them the information that they want under the circumstances,and about the Woody Allen,so what i can say about him,a great personality he is,and also distinguished by his rapid rate of production and his very large body of work,and he have made him a notable American director.

Dissertation Help

This post is an excellent,I keep returning to read the content that is always updated. Thanks!I am interested in reading more of your stuff. 

Dissertation

Unique and useful information is hard to find today on the internet. Please keep posting such informative articles. Regards.

Arriplynirm

Moncler coats for menmoncler jacken, special capabilities. Moncler jacket is colored to match your mood and style and are ideal to assist you. They sleep during the winter white appear and Moncler, what to complete about it. Eliminate the stereotype, cease turn, Moncler jackets and Sass dich.Barbour by no means walks of Fashion and also the objective of Moncler it, all kinds of clothes for every person, regardless of for males or women. come in such a case, Moncler mens down jackets this year with special designs. Moncler outlet Children?

We are pleased to supply these coats for girls and we also supply accessories for this sort of coat, from gloves to headwear for ladies.Winter Coats are what I am trying to find!Carhartt Coats has a choice of coats that can be utilised Moncler Males for winter from all 3 lines. 1 coat of note could be the Arctic Extreme Coat for males. This coat in constructed of black nylon Cordura,is waterproof and insulated with quilted polyester. You'll find two chest pockets, a split back for ease of movement, rib knit storm cuffs and an interior drawstring to maintain the wind out. It comes in Medium, Large and X- Huge in black only. Carhartt Coats prides itself on making only the top coats for both males and ladies for any kind of circumstance and temperature. Our rates are proper and our goods come with a satisfaction guarantee.

[url=http://www.monclermalls.com/moncler-shoes-c-8.html]Moncler Shoes[/url]
must be the fault of parents chooice for this season.Themoncler doudoune has been very well-known when we talk about the fashion world. Men and women appear completely comfy with wheat bran as Obsession with Moncler Mens Jackets it supplies. They're really stylish and hip-hop sort of jacket can make you stand in a public reaction. You will find that as long as you Mens Moncler Lengthy Down Coats Cream just simply because you wear a jacket.But nevertheless lovely they are, my own search for the excellent summer dress will never ever be restricted towards the high street. The winter is coming to buy a moncler, and find your self a warm embrace. Be a happiness woman. Mens series moncler has received its name that Moncler will be the most popular brands, including winter coats and jackets clothing.

Their fascination using the color and style of women in all its forms, to a large extent. Moncler is renowned not merely as a moncler jacket maker, Moncler Mens Coats but a great and high quality bags maker. Within the cold season, you are able to not ignore the existence of Moncler jackets. You are able to not miss, like fashion jackets within your wardrobe! Within the series of clothing Moncler,moncler doudoune for males, females Moncler jackets, Moncler, even children clothing, bring us all Moncler jackets Supra in all Jahreszeit. Moncler jackets not merely maintain warm for the season cold, but also give you the confidence to wear jackets Moncler outlet, himself an excellent winter.

Research Proposal Writer

guess is good ish..LOL Because of my AMH and reserve issues they recommend IVF however the down side is noone thinks Ill have enough eggs to freeze so the multicycle programs are out and they think it will most definetly take more than one IVF cycle.

[url=http://www.researchproposalwriters.weebly.com]Research Proposal Writers[/url

Arriplynirm

Using the assist of our guidebook, currently you will learn many wonderful secrets and techniques to getting a effective excursion. Utilize the facts for your prepared location to appreciate having a memorable expertise. These guidelines and methods will allow you to to conserve time and income with little [url=http://www.canada-goose-outletshop.com/]Canada Goose Outlet[/url]
perform in any way.

When touring make certain to inform someone of your journey options, in particular when you are departing and returning. This can be an added security within the dire but probable insurance exactly where some thing happens to you on youe trip. Much better to give your self that added safety that an individual is seeking out for you personally than sorry.

When traveling internationally, organize your tour guides ahead of time, and ensure that they converse English. This does not need to suggest that you employ a tour manual business, having said that. Speak for your hotel in advance and request an English-speaking person to "hang out" with you for the day. You will in all probability receive a nearby who can care for issues like, exactly where to consume, and returning you safely for your hotel.

When likely by means of airport security with your pet you'll be needed to consider them from their carrier. The security will then scan the carrier to become confident that it is secure for journey. You must ensure that that your pet might be able to handle the hustle and bustle from the airport ahead of trying to journey with them.

Should you often get cold quickly, deliver a jacket or fleece inside the event that it's chilly in your flight. In case you don't require it, it is possible to [url=http://www.canada-goose-outletshop.com/]Canada Goose Parka[/url]
often consider it off, but it is generally much better to err around the aspect of caution to maintain convenience at all times.

Now that you simply have located out concerning the strategies to having a effective journey consider a second to determine how you are able to apply them directly for your planned destination. Get pleasure from getting greater preparation for anything that arrives your way. Use these strategies to develop memories that you simply will bear in mind for your rest of your lifestyle.

ErrorsBeege

Are you currently certainly one of those people who cannot cook to save your life? Have you burned water or spilled an entire carton of milk? Do not be concerned -- cooking is easy, and this post is here to show you how! Read on to locate out easy recommendations to help you cook far better!

It's a superior thought to cook your green vegetables in boiling hot water. In the event you location the veggies in cold water and wait for it to come to a boil you might [url=http://www.thelouis-vuitton-outlet.com/]Louis Vuitton Online[/url]
a lot of the green color since the chlorophyll in them will leech into the water.

Freeze overripe bananas. You don't need to throw out brown bananas. If they are overripe prior to you are able to eat them, just freeze them for later. Overripe bananas are nonetheless fantastic for smoothies. You could even use them as an ingredient in baked goods like banana bread or muffins.

Store your home-baked goodies and leftovers that need to have refrigeration in square or rectangular-shaped storage containers. Round containers are good, but take up precious refrigerator space while square and rectangular containers make the most in the restricted shelf space. Rectangular storage containers also are less complicated to stack and store and save on space inside your cupboards too.

As you are able to see, cooking is not so challenging as you might have made it out to be. As long as you stick with easy recipes and follow the simple recommendations laid out in this article, you will be cooking like a pro and saving yourself funds on food in no time.
Cooking Suggestions For Your On The Go Life-style

Have you generally wanted to grow to be a superior cook? There are numerous tips and tips on tips on how to enhance your strategy in cooking. Understanding tips on how to cook superior [url=http://www.bestcanada-goose-outlet.com/]canada goose jackets[/url]
enjoy it additional can boost the excellent of life for you and your household. Read this article for some neat suggestions that cooks of all experience levels can use.

The comments to this entry are closed.

At home with Hitler